🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I traditionally steered clear of significant use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons adventures. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice rather than the roll of a die. However, I opted to change my approach, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Catalyst: Observing an Improvised Tool

An influential actual-play show showcases a DM who frequently calls for "luck rolls" from the participants. This involves selecting a specific dice and defining possible results based on the number. This is essentially no different from consulting a random table, these are devised in the moment when a course of events doesn't have a predetermined conclusion.

I opted to test this approach at my own table, mainly because it appeared interesting and provided a break from my standard routine. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to reflect on the perennial balance between pre-determination and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

A Powerful Session Moment

In a recent session, my players had survived a city-wide battle. Later, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had lived. Rather than picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; a high roll, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This resulted in a profoundly moving moment where the adventurers came upon the bodies of their allies, forever clasped together in death. The group performed a ceremony, which was especially significant due to previous roleplaying. In a concluding touch, I chose that the remains were suddenly transformed, revealing a enchanted item. By chance, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the party required to address another pressing story problem. One just orchestrate such serendipitous moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This event led me to ponder if chance and thinking on your feet are in fact the core of D&D. Even if you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Players often excel at derailing the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a skilled DM has to be able to think quickly and create scenarios in the moment.

Using similar mechanics is a fantastic way to develop these talents without straying too much outside your preparation. The key is to use them for minor decisions that don't fundamentally change the campaign's main plot. As an example, I would avoid using it to establish if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I would consider using it to figure out whether the PCs enter a room moments before a major incident occurs.

Empowering Player Agency

This technique also helps make players feel invested and create the impression that the story is responsive, progressing in reaction to their actions as they play. It combats the feeling that they are merely characters in a pre-written script, thereby bolstering the cooperative aspect of storytelling.

Randomization has long been embedded in the original design. Original D&D were reliant on random tables, which suited a game focused on exploration. While modern D&D frequently focuses on plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the required method.

Striking the Right Balance

It is perfectly nothing wrong with being prepared. But, it's also fine no problem with stepping back and allowing the whim of chance to guide minor details instead of you. Control is a big part of a DM's responsibilities. We need it to manage the world, yet we often struggle to cede it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

A piece of recommendation is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Try a little improvisation for inconsequential details. It may find that the organic story beat is infinitely more memorable than anything you would have planned by yourself.